Democracy
I
|
INTRODUCTION
|
Democracy (Greek demos,”the people”;
kratein, “to rule”), political system in which the people of a country
rule through any form of government they choose to establish. In modern
democracies, supreme authority is exercised for the most part by
representatives elected by popular suffrage. The representatives may be
supplanted by the electorate according to the legal procedures of recall and
referendum, and they are, at least in principle, responsible to the electorate.
In many democracies, such as the United States, both the executive head of
government and the legislature are elected. In typical constitutional
monarchies such as the United Kingdom and Norway, only the legislators are
elected, and from their ranks a cabinet and a prime minister are chosen.
Although often used interchangeably,
the terms democracy and republic are not synonymous. Both systems
delegate the power to govern to their elected representatives. In a republic,
however, these officials are expected to act on their own best judgment of the
needs and interests of the country. The officials in a democracy more generally
and directly reflect the known or ascertained views of their constituents,
sometimes subordinating their own judgment.
II
|
DEMOCRACY IN ANCIENT GREECE AND
ROME
|
Rule by the people played
an important part in the democracies of the pre-Christian era. The democracies
of the city-states of classical Greece and of Rome during the early years of
the Republic were unlike the democracies of today. They were direct
democracies, in which all citizens could speak and vote in assemblies that
resembled New England town meetings. Representative government was unknown and
unnecessary because of the small size of the city-states (almost never more
than 10,000 citizens). Ancient democracy did not presuppose equality of all
individuals; the majority of the populace, notably slaves and women, had no
political rights. Athens, the greatest of the city democracies, limited the
franchise to native-born citizens. Roman democracy resembled that of the
Greeks, although Rome sometimes granted citizenship to men of non-Roman
descent. The Roman Stoic philosophy, which defined the human race as part of a
divine principle, and the Jewish and Christian religions, which emphasized the
rights of the underprivileged and the equality of all before God, contributed
to the development of modern democratic theory.
The Roman Republic ended
in the despotism of the empire. The free cities of Italy, Germany, and Flanders
carried on the democratic tradition and applied some principles of democracy
during the Middle Ages. Slaves ceased to constitute a major portion of national
populations. As feudalism ended, a rich commercial middle class arose,
possessing the money and leisure necessary to participate in governmental
affairs. One result was the rebirth of a spirit of freedom based on ancient
Greek and Roman principles. Concepts of equal political and social rights were
further defined during the Renaissance, when the development of humanism was
fostered, and later during the Reformation, in the struggle for religious
freedom.
III
|
WESTERN EUROPE AND THE U.S.
|
Beginning with the first
popular rebellion against monarchy in England (1642), which was brought to a
climax by the execution of King Charles I, political and revolutionary action
against autocratic European governments resulted in the establishment of
democratic governments. Such action was inspired and guided largely by
political philosophers, notably the French philosophers Montesquieu and Jean
Jacques Rousseau, and the American statesmen Thomas Jefferson and James
Madison. Before the end of the 19th century, every important Western European
monarchy had adopted a constitution limiting the power of the Crown and giving
a considerable share of political power to the people. In many of these
countries, a representative legislature modeled on the British Parliament was
instituted. British politics was then possibly the greatest single influence on
the organization of world democracies, although the French Revolution also
exerted a powerful influence. Later, the success of democratic institutions in
the United States served as a model for many peoples.
The major features of
modern democracy include individual freedom, which entitles citizens to the
liberty and responsibility of shaping their own careers and conducting their
own affairs; equality before the law; and universal suffrage and education.
Such features have been proclaimed in great historic documents, for example,
the U.S. Declaration of Independence, which asserted the right to life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; the French Declaration of the Rights of
Man and of the Citizen, which affirmed the principles of civil liberty and of
equality before the law; and the Atlantic Charter, which formulated the four
basic freedoms.
By the middle of the 20th
century, every independent country in the world, with only a few exceptions,
had a government that, in form if not in practice, embodied some of the
principles of democracy. Although the ideals of democracy have been widely
professed, the practice and fulfillment have been different in many countries.
In early 1989, in preparation
for a transfer to democracy, Babangida approved a new constitution that
introduced only minor changes to the 1979 constitution. In May he lifted the
ban on political organizations but refused to recognize any of the new parties,
instead channeling politics into the government-created Social Democratic Party
(SDP) and National Republic Convention (NRC). Federal legislative elections
were finally held in July 1992, with the SDP winning a majority in both houses
of the legislature. The presidential elections were delayed, finally held in
June 1993, then annulled by the military when initial election results indicated
that SDP candidate and wealthy publisher Moshood Abiola had won by a large
majority. Babangida, however, claimed he still supported a transition to
democracy and in August transferred power to an interim government. The new
government lasted all of three months before General Sani Abacha, the powerful
secretary of defense, overthrew it and assumed control. Among Abacha’s first
acts was the termination of all political activity.
The institutions of all governments emerge
from basic principles. In the United States the one basic principle is
representative democracy, which defines a system in which the people govern
themselves by electing their own leaders. The American government functions to
secure this principle and to further the common interests of the people.
Democracy in America is based on six
essential ideals: (1) People must accept the principle of majority rule. (2)
The political rights of minorities must be protected. (3) Citizens must agree
to a system of rule by law. (4) The free exchange of opinions and ideas must
not be restricted. (5) All citizens must be equal before the law. (6)
Government exists to serve the people, because it derives its power from the
people. These ideals form the basis of the democratic system in the United
States, which seeks to create a union of diverse peoples, places, and
interests.
|
||
United States: Flag and Anthem
|
|
To implement its essential democratic ideals,
the United States has built its government on four elements: (1) popular
sovereignty, meaning that the people are the ultimate source of the
government’s authority; (2) representative government; (3) checks and balances;
and (4) federalism, an arrangement where powers are shared by different levels
of government.
Every government has a source of its sovereignty
or authority, and most of the political structures of the U.S. government apply
the doctrine of popular sovereignty. In previous centuries the source of
sovereignty in some countries was the monarchy-the divine right of kings to
rule. Americans place the source of authority in the people who, in a
democratic society, reign. In this idea the citizens collectively represent the
nation’s authority. They then express that authority individually by voting to
elect leaders to represent them in government. “I know no safe repository of
the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves,” wrote Thomas
Jefferson in 1820, “and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise
their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from
them but to inform their discretion.” This was an experimental idea at the
time, but today Americans take it for granted.
The second principle of U.S. democracy is
representative government. In a representative government, the people delegate
their powers to elected officials. In the United States, candidates compete for
the presidency, the Senate, and the House of Representatives, as well as for
many state and local positions. In turn these elected officials represent the
will of the people and ensure that the government is accountable to its
citizens. In a democracy, the people exercise power through elections, which
allow adult citizens of the United States the chance to have their voices heard
and to influence government. With their vote, they can remove officials who
ignore their intentions or who betray their trust. Political leaders are
accountable as agents of the people; this accountability is an important
feature of the American system of representative government.
In order to truly work, however,
representative government must represent all people. Originally, the only
people allowed to vote, and thus to be represented, were white men who owned
property—a small percentage of the population. Gradually, voting rights were
broadened to
include white men without property, blacks, Native
Americans, naturalized immigrants, and women.
Government:
|
The third principle of
American democracy is the system of checks and balances. The three branches of
government—the legislative, the executive, and the judicial—restrain and
stabilize one another through their separated functions. The legislative
branch, represented by Congress, must pass bills before they can become law.
The executive branch—namely, the president—can veto bills passed by Congress,
thus preventing them from becoming law. In turn, by a two-thirds vote, Congress
can override the president’s veto. The Supreme Court may invalidate acts of
Congress by declaring them contrary to the Constitution of the United States,
but Congress can change the Constitution through the amendment process.
The fourth principle of democracy in the
United States is federalism. In the American federal system, the states and the
national government divide authority. This division of power helps curb abuses
by either the national or the state governments.
D5
|
Nigeria Under Abacha
|
The Nigerian Labour Congress,
which had already held a general strike to protest the annulled election of
Abiola, organized another general strike to protest Abacha’s coup. Political
pressure groups such as the Campaign for Democracy also stepped up protests
against Abacha. In May 1994 the government announced plans for political reform
and held elections for local governments and delegates to yet another
constitutional conference. In October 1995 Abacha lifted the ban on political
activity, promised a transfer to civilian power in 1998, and later allowed five
parties to operate. However, he continued his repression of dissidents, the
most notorious instance of which was the hanging of writer Ken Saro-Wiwa and
eight other activists in November 1995. Saro-Wiwa and his fellow dissidents
were critics of the oil industry, which had brought a range of environmental
ills to their Ogoni homeland in the Niger Delta. The government dubiously
accused the activists of murdering government supporters, gave them a hasty,
unfair trial, and executed them. The Abacha government imprisoned many people,
among the most prominent being former president Olusegun Obasanjo, former vice
president Shehu Musa Yar’Adua (who died in prison in December 1997), and the
1993 president-elect, Moshood Abiola. Other prominent Nigerians, including
Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka, fled into exile. The execution and imprisonment of
opponents and other violations of human rights intensified international
pressure on Abacha and resulted in Nigeria’s suspension from the British
Commonwealth of Nations.
Internally, Abacha managed
to maintain support from some segments of the population, especially among his
Hausa-Fulani compatriots. In 1995 a constitutional commission presented a draft
constitution. Abacha promised to implement the constitution and return the
country to civilian rule following presidential elections in October 1998. He
was widely expected to be declared the winner of the elections, as all five
officially sanctioned political parties had nominated him in April 1998.
However, in June 1998 Abacha died suddenly of a heart attack.
Transition to Democracy:
Major General Abdulsalam
Abubakar succeeded Abacha as president and pledged to return Nigeria to
civilian rule after holding free, democratic elections. Moshood Abiola,
imprisoned since apparently winning the 1993 presidential election, was widely
believed to be the frontrunner for the presidency. However, just before he was
to be released from prison, Abiola also died suddenly. Abubakar promoted the
establishment of political parties and freed political prisoners arrested by
Abacha, including former president Olusegun Obasanjo. Nigeria held legislative
and presidential elections in February and March 1999, and Obasanjo was elected
president. The military administration handed over power to Nigeria’s new
civilian government in May, and the country adopted a new constitution. The
Commonwealth of Nations lifted its suspension of Nigeria’s membership to
coincide with the resumption of civilian rule.
Obasanjo’s first years
in office were plagued by sporadic outbursts of communal violence across the
country. Clashes between religious and ethnic groups, often spawned by local
political disputes, have killed thousands of Nigerians since 1999. In April
2003 Obasanjo was reelected to another term, winning the election by a wide
margin. International observers
criticized the election for widespread incidents of electoral fraud in some
states.
In 2006 Obasanjo and his
supporters attempted to amend Nigeria’s constitution so that Obasanjo could
prolong his term in office. However, the effort failed. In the presidential
elections in April 2007 Obasanjo’s hand-picked successor, Umaru Yar’Adua, won
in a landslide with about 70 percent of the vote. Opposition parties charged
fraud, and international election observers described the vote process as
“flawed.” Yar’Adua took office in May. As head of the People’s Democratic
Party, Obasanjo’s influence over Nigeria’s government and its policies was
expected to continue.
.
Comments